Bleacher Report Joins YouTube Parade, Adds 4 New Shows

We’ve been asking the question about whether or not YouTube is becoming the next big de facto sports network, and Bleacher Report seems to agree with the idea — at least the news today about B/R launching four new YouTube shows points in that general direction.

Here’s the quick take: The old impression of YouTube is bad cell phone videos and crazy cat stunts. The new impression is professional quality content, from the rights owners themselves, available 24/7 to an audience that might just be mobile. For Bleacher Report, which is already reporting that 40 percent of its traffic comes from a mobile viewing platform, more YouTube shows makes perfect sense. Distribution costs are low, it’s easy to find and connect, and younger Internet users are familiar with the format.

It’s also interesting to note that for its video shows and for its site in general, Bleacher Report is adding more professional writers and producers to augment the fan-contributed material that made B/R a different animal than existing sports sites.

UPDATE: YouTube’s own blog spells out some more sports programming on the video giant. (Thanks to @xpangler for the HT)

Is YouTube the New SportsCenter? ESPN Thinks So

Remember those old days, grampa Internet, when you used to have to watch SportsCenter on ESPN to see video highlights of the day’s best plays? Remember them slightly newer days, daddio, when you could go online and maybe see some sketchy vid-clips of broadcast games before they were taken down?

No? Me neither. I’ve completely forgotten those days of 2011 and now just rely on Twitter and YouTube for my sports highlights coverage — like for instance, today’s incredible finish of the always classic Duke vs. North Carolina matchup. Within minutes, the official, ESPN approved clip is on YouTube — commercial free!

I’m not sure if this dims overall ESPN viewership numbers — by all recent accounts there is nothing but an upward curve for ESPN content viewership — so it makes sense for ESPN, instead of online pirateers, to take advantage of the Internet replays that are going to happen anyhow. Seems like the NBA agrees with this approach as well.

Somewhere in here there are the seeds of a discussion about how YouTube is becoming, or has become, the new sports network — and I’d spend time writing about it when I am done watching some Shaun White clips of sick snowboard stunts. Talk amongst yourselves.

Super Bowl Advertisers Ready to Target Mobile Users

Are you a fan of football but do not watch the Super Bowl for the ads? There may be no escaping them this year as increasingly advertisers realize that there is an untapped market for them in the online world during a game known for its broadcast ads.

A recent survey by Harris Interactive that was commissioned by mobile marketing firm Velti, as reported by MediaPost, shows that a full 60% of mobile phone users plan to also use and view their phone while watching the game.

While the news that people will use their phones is hardly earth shattering, another part of the report shows that people are twice as likely to use their phone during the ads and during the half time show. This might not be great news to companies that are shelling out an average $3.5 million for a 30 second ad, up 17% from last year.

As mobile usage soars advertisers target new space

According to Forbes the price on Super Bowl ads has increased an average of 5.7% annually, and it is predicting that the going rate will double again within the next decade making online increasingly appealing.

A late comer advertiser or a company that delays in buying the time, which sold out prior to Thanksgiving this year have an option, and one that companies that are advertising on the game telecast are taking as well- targeting mobile users in what is now being called the second screen market.

Already the bulk of the ads that are slated for broadcast on the airwaves are available online as either an ad targeting users or as a YouTube video to attract more fans. However there is an entirely different class that is just sticking with the less costly mobile ad space.

The broadcast ads are dominated by major corporations, centering around 5 market segments: automotive, beer, motion picture, soft drinks and tortilla chips, according to a recent Nielson study. Many of these will replicate their presence online as well, but there is opportunities for others as well.

The popularity of Super Bowl ads is amazing. Simply head over to YouTube’s Ad Blitz, a site dedicated to Super Bowl ads, to get a feel for just how popular this is. As of Thursday morning prior to the game there were 39,000 subscribers to the channel and 800,000 video views.

Go to Coke’s Facebook page and you can see a group of polar bears, one set in each team’s uniforms, reacting to the game in real time. The loss of eyeballs during the broadcast could be part of the broadcast advertisers own doing since many seem prepared to drive broadcast viewers online.

The Harris study found that sites like Shazam, Subway and Chevrolet have specialized apps that will support viewers driven from broadcast ads to on-line and present the opportunity to win prizes or participate in some activity.

Then if you have seen an ad that seems worth viewing again on the broadcast, you can always head over to iTunes to get an app that allows you to view past favorite Super Bowl ads as well as new ones as soon as they are available on YouTube.

I expect that the number of ads that are designed to be viewed by mobile devices only will be a strong growth category in the future, particularly as tablets continue to grow in popularity. A sharp advertiser does not care if you continue to watch the game after you have viewed their ad, so why not try and snare your attention via some focused programs online at a corporate web site?

NBA Wastes No Time Slamming Griffin’s Monster Dunk Onto Social Media

That didn’t take long, did it? Minutes after LA Clipper Blake Griffin completely posterized Oklahoma City’s Kendrick Perkins, the dunk of the year in all its glory was all over the web, even in a slo-mo clip embedded above on YouTube, courtesy of the NBA.

Remember when you had to wait for the next SportsCenter to view highlights? Or could only see somebody’s hazy shot of a webcam capture of a TV screen? Those days are so 2010. Welcome to the new era, where sports is served up immediately, social-media style. Right now Kendrick Perkins, #dunkoftheyear and Blake Griffin are all trending on Twitter and if you don’t get a link there just hit Google News and the NBA is already serving up league-approved clips of the dunk.

The takeaway, other than the fact that this dude is perhaps the all-time slam champion: Nobody’s waiting for TV anymore. The big screen might still be the best place to watch, but it’s no longer the first.

Of course, SportsCenter wasn’t far behind. This tweet hit a minute after our post. Glad to know they’re burning the midnight oil in Bristol. Or maybe down in LA where ESPN left coast hangs out.

#SCtop10 What name should we give Blake Griffin’s dunk over Kendrick Perkins: http://t.co/P75l8m71

@SportsCenter

SportsCenter

Twitter Scores KO of ESPN in Harbaugh/Schwartz Tiff

It was get-our-pumpkins day here at the MSR main household so I pretty much missed the NFL in real time Sunday, leaving me with a lot of catch-up viewing as I settled in to watch the Bears dismantle the Vikings. With all the headlines screaming not about the Niners’ upset win over the Lions but some apparent scuffle between the head coaches, I went default and hit the ESPN recap of the Niners-Lions to see what happened.

Here’s what I did see: A few IBM commercials, a Farmers Insurance commercial and some ESPN folks talking about the scuffle, but no actual video of the fracas itself. Though several of the video headlines on ESPN’s Lions-Niners page mention the postgame bout (gotta love that sportswriter copy-edit classic: “Tempers Flair Following 49ers’ Win”) none of them show the actual footage — even the one titled “Coaches Scuffle” is just the two coaches talking about their embarrassing encounter.

No money shot. No video. I understand what ESPN wants me to do here. Leave the website, and go turn on my TV. Where I will watch SportsCenter for an hour.

OK, did that. Then I got back to the computer and tried to find the video online. Next default move was a Google search, which turned up a YouTube video that had already been pulled down due to NFL copyright infringement. Strike two.

For my third choice I went to where I should have gone first and where sports fans should increasingly turn to when it comes to breaking news — check the Twitter trending list, and simply (like I did) click on “Jim Schwartz.” Within seconds I had several different news-station feeds and replays, closeups of the “fight,” takes and commentary… all courtesy not of the “Worldwide leader in sports” but from the new real-time sports network that delivers faster, more comprehensive links to real coverage than ESPN does… right now.

And ESPN… while we’re kvetching let me say that I understand this is a business and I don’t mind watching one online ad before viewing video highlights. But a new pre-roll every time I click on a new link is brutal. In TV land that would be a 30 second commercial for every minute of air time. Like I said before — seems like ESPN’s web strategy is designed to get you to turn off your computer and turn on your TV. Twitter, save us!

Thanks to NFL.com for putting the fracas first in the video highlights. Another new go-to spot instead of ESPN.

Colorado State Hoops Goes Big on Twitter

There might not be a media outlet more confused about Twitter than ESPN — after watching an NFL Gameday “feature” from this past weekend on the league’s use of Twitter that could have been filmed a couple years ago (it lightly touched on the Chad Ochocinco non-controversies and then quoted NFL PR exec Greg Aiello as saying Twitter is fun), you then can’t find the feature archived anywhere on the network’s site. But you also can’t avoid Twitter on other programs and shows, like the new NFL32 show where live Tweets are run crawler-style under the video, and athlete Tweets are repurposed nearly every minute.

The good news is, it seems like ESPN’s younger reporters and bloggers are completely dialed in to the microblogging service, and quickly spot good uses of it, like the hilariously cheesy videos being cranked out by the Colorado State University basketball team like the one embedded above.

As a CU grad it chafes a bit to think that some Rams from Fort Fun are doing a better job of having fun with social media than my beloved Buffaloes, but let’s see if Colorado can catch up. More importantly, let’s see if Tad Boyle and the Buff hoopsters can win some games. Then they can worry about the in-state YouTube/Twitter competition.